'RE: [Mondrian] Re: Build failed in Hudson: mondrian #627'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mondrian
Subject:    RE: [Mondrian] Re: Build failed in Hudson: mondrian #627
From:       "Julian Hyde" <jhyde () pentaho ! com>
Date:       2009-02-24 7:50:11
Message-ID: 82A3D7B289E2465B9F663C9AD49354C9 () mackerel
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

PS I agree that in general we sholdn't be issuing multiple jars with the
same version number.

  _____  

From: mondrian-bounces@pentaho.org [mailto:mondrian-bounces@pentaho.org] On
Behalf Of Julian Hyde
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:52 PM
To: Aaron Phillips
Cc: Mondrian
Subject: [Mondrian] Re: Build failed in Hudson: mondrian #627

Yup. Same source, just one file duplicated in the jar.

On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Aaron Phillips <aphillips@pentaho.com> wrote:

Julian,
Am I understanding correctly that you have redeployed olap4j with the same
version of 0.9.7.145?
Normally I would not recommend that, especially if the contents are
different source-wise.  I can understand if the jar was improperly built
though.
I will purge the ivy cache of olap4j jars and poke the Mondrian build.

-Aaron

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6001.18203" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=572074907-24022009><FONT face="Lucida Sans" 
color=#000080 size=2>PS I agree that in general we sholdn't be issuing multiple 
jars with the same version number.</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
  <HR tabIndex=-1>
  <FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> mondrian-bounces@pentaho.org 
  [mailto:mondrian-bounces@pentaho.org] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Julian 
  Hyde<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 23, 2009 12:52 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Aaron 
  Phillips<BR><B>Cc:</B> Mondrian<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Mondrian] Re: Build failed 
  in Hudson: mondrian #627<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
  <DIV></DIV>
  <DIV>Yup. Same source, just one file duplicated in the jar.<BR><BR>On Feb 23, 
  2009, at 12:29 PM, Aaron Phillips &lt;<A 
  href="mailto:aphillips@pentaho.com">aphillips@pentaho.com</A>&gt; 
  wrote:<BR><BR></DIV>
  <DIV></DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
    <DIV>Julian,<BR>Am I understanding correctly that you have redeployed olap4j 
    with the same version of <TT>0.9.7.145</TT>?<BR>Normally I would not 
    recommend that, especially if the contents are different source-wise.&nbsp; 
    I can understand if the jar was improperly built though.<BR>I will purge the 
    ivy cache of olap4j jars and poke the Mondrian 
  build.<BR><BR>-Aaron</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

_______________________________________________
Mondrian mailing list
Mondrian@pentaho.org
http://lists.pentaho.org/mailman/listinfo/mondrian

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 