[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mico-devel
Subject:    Re: [mico-devel] Different treatment for localhost communication?
From:       Patrick_Gräbel <pgraebel () stud ! fh-dortmund ! de>
Date:       2006-10-18 16:54:42
Message-ID: 45365C52.4010003 () stud ! fh-dortmund ! de
[Download RAW message or body]


Thanks!

This is what I was asking for. Unfortunately I am developing on Windows
platform, so "unix:" isn't a choice. The example "bench" also uses
"local:" for communication inside a _single_ process. Furthermore the
unix version of this example uses PIDs for _inter-process_
communication. Is inter-process communication also possible on Windows
(maybe an argument to "local:")?

The MICO document is not very helpful on this.

Patrick


Karel Gardas wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> MICO also supports Unix domain sockets for localhost communication. Have
> a look into demo/bench/bench script for more information how to use them
> and also try to use this demo in order to get an idea about the
> communication speedup.
> 
> Karel
> 
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Patrick Gräbel wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I guess, the actual data transfer of CORBA is implementation specific.
>> If that's true: is MICO using sockets for client/server communication on
>> localhost, too? Does MICO use a more efficient way or just a different
>> technique (e. g. shared memory) for this special case?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Patrick
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mico-devel mailing list
>> Mico-devel@mico.org
>> http://www.mico.org/mailman/listinfo/mico-devel
>>
> 
> -- 
> Karel Gardas                  kgardas@objectsecurity.com
> ObjectSecurity Ltd.           http://www.objectsecurity.com

_______________________________________________
Mico-devel mailing list
Mico-devel@mico.org
http://www.mico.org/mailman/listinfo/mico-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]