[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mercurial
Subject:    Mercurial popularity is stagnant
From:       cowwoc <cowwoc () bbs ! darktech ! org>
Date:       2014-06-30 17:35:51
Message-ID: 1404149751603-4011549.post () n3 ! nabble ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

I'd like to bring your attention to:
http://www.google.ca/trends/explore?hl=en-US&q=mercurial,+git,+github,+bitbucket&cmpt=q&content=1 \


It seems to me that GitHub is directly responsible for Git's popularity
skyrocketing in 2009. By comparison, Mercurial's popularity seems to be
stagnant for a while. Bitbucket initially did a decent job, but ever since
they got bought out by Atlassian all public announcements emphasize Git
support and don't mention Mercurial at all.

Case in point:
http://blog.bitbucket.org/2012/12/10/feature-branches-just-got-better/

How do we go about reversing this trend?

Gili



--
View this message in context: \
http://mercurial.808500.n3.nabble.com/Mercurial-popularity-is-stagnant-tp4011549.html \
Sent from the General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. \
_______________________________________________ Mercurial mailing list
Mercurial@selenic.com
http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]