[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mercurial
Subject:    Re: Mercurial Workflow: Feature seperation via named branches
From:       Snidely <snidely.too () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-06-26 19:31:16
Message-ID: f5a19b10-36f3-46d2-a9de-1d715b74cb8c () a7g2000vby ! googlegroups ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Jun 26, 12:07 pm, Snidely <snidely....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Perhaps Arne could update his workflow description to note that this
> works best for small-to-medium-sized repos (link to a performance
> page) and suggest a different workflow for larger repositories?  (The
> first one that comes to mind is using clones to replace the named
> branches.)

Um, that may be an excessive fix for small feature branches (as
opposed to the major branches Sebastien mentions) and individual bug
fixes.  I'll just watch for updates on the bookmark/namedbranch
interaction.

/dps
_______________________________________________
Mercurial mailing list
Mercurial@selenic.com
http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]