[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mercurial
Subject:    Re: https over proxy and other stuff ;)
From:       Michal Hlavac <hlavki () hlavki ! eu>
Date:       2008-01-10 20:32:41
Message-ID: 200801102132.44656.hlavki () hlavki ! eu
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


D=C5=88a Thursday 10 January 2008 19:46:21 Matt Mackall ste nap=C3=ADsal:
> On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 09:04 +0100, Michal Hlavac wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we tried connection to mercurial via proxy and https. Client connects to
> > proxy connection through GET (not connect) so it doesn't work.
>
> Probably fixable:
>
>  http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/456195
>
> Care to take a stab at it?
>

looks primising...

> > Humble opinion:
> > I must say that I see here problem with complexity of python. I am java
> > programmer and at this time is very popular talking about complexity of
> > java. Some people says java is too complex bla bla bla...
> > On the other hand, python hasn't API support for some basic features and
> > has to use some native libraries...
> > e.g. uses native library which doesn't support client certificates over
> > https.
>
> That's a fascinating perspective. Java is perhaps the -only- language
> that considers client certificates over HTTPS to be a "basic feature".
> It's mostly a side-effect of being glued onto the web since birth.

important is you understand me and our needs ;)

thanks, miso

["smime.p7s" (application/pkcs7-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Mercurial mailing list
Mercurial@selenic.com
http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]