[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       maven-user
Subject:    Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
From:       Stefano Fornari <stefano.fornari () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-01-03 21:58:00
Message-ID: d88c03161001031358se9257e7v36adcf4bd69f15c0 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

It looks like my prev message got stopped because of the attachment...

Hi Siegfried,
here (http://github.com/stefanofornari/script-maven-plugin) you find
what I've done so far. If you think it could make sense,
I can set up a git repository until Tomek gives us directions.

NOTES:

1. I have removed the parent section from the pom, I could not find it
on any repository
2. I did not change the site yet.

Any feedback is welcome.

Ste

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<siegfried.goeschl@it20one.at> wrote:
> Same here .... :-)
>
> Stefano Fornari wrote:
>> Hi Tomek,
>> I think I'll have a first version by tonight. How would you like to
>> proceed? Shall I pack the source code and post it to the list? Or do
>> you prefer a patch (but keep in mind there will be a lot of changes).
>>
>> Please let me know.
>> Ste
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Tomasz Pik <tompik@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari
>>> <stefano.fornari@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>>>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>>>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>>>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
>>>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>>>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>>>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>>>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>>>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>>>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>>>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>>>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>>>> simple mojo.
>>>>
>>> Yes, go for it.
>>> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind
>>> and then whole GMaven thing comes...
>>> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments,
>>> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tomek
>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Stefano
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ste
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Ste

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]