[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mason
Subject:    Re: [Mason] mason webapp best practices
From:       Dave Rolsky <autarch () urth ! org>
Date:       2007-07-02 20:37:52
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.0.99.0707021536480.8364 () urth ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Sam Tregar wrote:

> Take a look at MasonX::WebApp.  With discipline it could give you
> nearly as much separation between form and function as something like
> CGI::Application.  The key here is to keep the complex application
> code in modules, leaving the components with just display management.

As the author of MasonX::WebApp, I'd recommend Catalyst instead. 
MX::WebApp is better than "everything in components", but it's not nearly 
as flexible and powerful as Catalyst.

I probably won't be doing much (if any) future development on MX::WebApp, 
FWIW.


-dave

/*===================================================
VegGuide.Org                        www.BookIRead.com
Your guide to all that's veg.       My book blog
===================================================*/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]