[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mapserver-dev
Subject:    Re: [mapserver-dev] RFC 62: Support Additional WFS	GetFeature
From:       Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam () pobox ! com>
Date:       2010-10-12 15:41:14
Message-ID: 4CB4819A.2010009 () pobox ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Note I haven't mentioned anything about a wfs_formats metadata item.
> Were you thinking this would list a set of formats that would be
> permitted for WFS GetFeature()?  As currently specified I think WFS
> GetFeature would support any templates defined via OUTPUTFORMAT,
> the traditional GML2 and GML3 values and any OGR OUTPUTFORMATs defined
> in the map file.  In fact, I can see that it would be quite helpful
> to restrict the set of output formats supported by WFS for particular
> layers.  So despite the start of voting, I'm going to update the RFC to:

Jeff,

OK, rereading my own specification I see I was wrong - I had already
introduce a wfs_formats metadata item and then flushed it from my brain!
the values in the wfs_formats name will be the "NAME" parameter from the
OUTPUTFORMAT declaration.  So in case of a format like:


OUTPUTFORMAT
   NAME "MSCSV"
   DRIVER "OGR/CSV"
   MIMETYPE "text/csv"
   FORMATOPTION "LCO:GEOMETRY=AS_WKT"
   FORMATOPTION "STORAGE=filesystem"
   FORMATOPTION "FORM=simple"
   FORMATOPTION "FILENAME=result.csv"
END

The value in wfs_formats would be "MSCSV". I will clarify this in the RFC.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent

_______________________________________________
mapserver-dev mailing list
mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]