[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mapguide-internals
Subject:    RE: [mapguide-internals] should GETSITEVERSION be always available?
From:       Jason Birch <Jason.Birch () nanaimo ! ca>
Date:       2009-06-25 15:28:07
Message-ID: 26D0CD10F2AC5B4E9C48C3F17D577BEA31963BED () kendrick
[Download RAW message or body]

I think that clients should probably be able to rely on at least a major version \
number (2.0 or 2.1) being obtainable from the server even in secure mode.  Otherwise \
there would be no way of making version-tolerant client apps.

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Morrison
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:45 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] should GETSITEVERSION be always available?

In a secure environment the less information you give out the better.  That being \
said for the RFC that is being discussed, how many servers are in a secure \
environment actually need to ping the server? \
_______________________________________________ mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]