[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mandrake-cooker
Subject:    Re: [Cooker] pornview: in contrib or plf?
From:       Mike Graham <linuxstarlighter () cfl ! rr ! com>
Date:       2002-11-30 23:23:06
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 30 November 2002 06:00 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
The RPM for pornview is already on Texstars website Pclinuxonline.com

> On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 22:55, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> > While the famous "Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib..." thread has
> > died down a bit, I've got the following question.
> >
> > I've found some software called "pornview" (great name!) -->
> > http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ . I've packaged it and am now wondering
> > if it's OK to upload it to contrib or if it would fit better in plf or
> > elsewhere. The software is GPL (no issues there), but the name can
> > disturb some people (I guess). Also the logo that comes with the
> > software (in the help --> about screen) is kind of explicit (18+). Any
> > mdk policies on this topic?
> >
> > Remember that sex sells!
> >
> > What is wisdom?
> >
> > with kind regards,
> >
> > Stefan van der Eijk
>
> The last time something like this came up I voiced a personal opinion
> that it shouldn't be in the main distro, and the package wound up in
> PLF.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]