[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mandoc-discuss
Subject:    Re: .Fn _* issue
From:       Jason McIntyre <jmc () kerhand ! co ! uk>
Date:       2010-09-25 21:49:19
Message-ID: 20100925212507.GM25298 () bramka ! kerhand ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:18:07PM +0200, Kristaps Dzonsons wrote:
> > 
> > hmm. i use TERM=wsvt25. so do you think there is a bug in the term code,
> > or it's something else?
> 
> There's nothing mandoc can do about it: the "_" character produces the
> same escape sequence when it's underlined as when it's bold ("_\b_").  I
> observe that, in this situation, the "underline" style has precedence
> (by colouring on the "linux" terminal).

so why groff displays "correctly" and mandoc not? the terminal
interprets those sequences? and i should just accept that there's a bit
screw up?

(not arguing, just clueless)

jmc
--
 To unsubscribe send an email to discuss+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]