[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mailman-users
Subject:    [Mailman-Users] Re: Reply-To: Poster via archive?
From:       Chip Davis <chip () aresti ! com>
Date:       2020-09-23 19:16:50
Message-ID: 313b2edc-5d7d-6f0a-c494-723485880be5 () aresti ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

... and, one hopes, elides the irrelevant archive postings.   [Sorry, 
one of my eldest crotchets.]

-Chip-

On 9/23/2020 2:11 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> If the user wants to reply to the poster in this way, she needs to edit
> the recipients when composing the mail. I recognize this is
> inconvenient, but no changes are contemplated.
On 9/23/20 8:11 AM, Thomas Gramstad wrote:
>> A subscriber to a list I have with a public archive, has NOMAIL set and
>> only reads and responds via the archive. But even though the list is set
>> up with Reply-To: Sender as default, this subscriber, even when he is
>> logged in, gets Reply-To list instead of Reply-To to poster when he
>> replies via the archive. Is there a way to reply to poster when reading
>> and replying via the official list archive?
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
    https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]