[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mageia-dev
Subject:    Re: [Mageia-dev] [115962]
From:       Zé <mmodem00 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-06-30 23:19:59
Message-ID: BANLkTi=Hb7Z0580eVHuROGNXzpK6-PqyXQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2011/6/30 Balcaen John <mikala@mageia.org>:
> On Thursday 30 June 2011 22:09:15 Zé wrote:
>> 2011/6/29 John Balcaen <mikala@mageia.org>:
>> > 2011/6/29  <root@mageia.org>:
>> >> Revision 115962 Author ze Date 2011-06-29 15:57:57 +0200 (Wed, 29 Jun
>> >> 2011)
>> >>
>> >> Log Message
>> >>
>> >> - no need to buildrequire and use kde-macros
>> >> - use rpm native macros and not variables
>> >
>> > [...]
>> > We were using kde4-macros especially because attica is maintained &
>> > requires by KDE, so it's easier to follow it (like a urpmf --requires
>> > kde4-macros Core_Release_SRPMS )
>>
>> Since attica only needs qt4 theres no need to use kde-macros, thats
>> why you also have qt cmake macros like %cmake_qt4
> I know that it's just using qt4 but we're using kde4 macros as convention here
> following our kde's spec layout.

But that layout is to apply for kde packages and for the ones that
require kde, when thats not the case why is there any need to apply
kde macros?
I dont see the point for that.


> --
> Balcaen John
> Jabber ID: mikala@jabber.littleboboy.net
>



-- 
Zé

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]