[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mageia-dev
Subject:    Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools
From:       Nicolas_Lécureuil <neoclust.mageia () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-10-02 15:52:47
Message-ID: AANLkTim04tWP6G29WSOhfirAwNdb3HOLqci33yJzfT6W () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2010/10/2 Fabrice Facorat <fabrice.facorat@gmail.com>

> 2010/10/1 Sinner from the Prairy <sinnerbofh@gmail.com>:
> > Fabrice Facorat wrote:
>
>
> > But the ones they have: work great, are integrated with the rest of the
> > ecosystem, are user-friendly and they are aesthetically pleasant.
> >
> > By focusing on 90% of specs and getting them to be 95% perfect, instead
> of
> > having 100% of specs and getting them to be just 50% workable, regular
> > people (95% of the population) like their products.
>
> you're 100% right
>
> > Apple's approach mimics the Unix philosophy (every small tool covers a
> task
> > extremely well, and integrates with the rest of the Unix system): every
> > single technical bullet point included does a task extremely well with
> the
> > rest of the tools and look'n'feel.
> >
> > Mandriva tries that, with look'n'feel consistent on MCC, KDE and Gnome.
> > draketools work on TUI or GUI. They work well.
>
> some tools does not work correctly however and are buggy
>
>
Better  is to fix them instead of rewrite all.

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/2 Fabrice Facorat <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:fabrice.facorat@gmail.com">fabrice.facorat@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, \
204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> 2010/10/1 Sinner from the Prairy &lt;<a \
href="mailto:sinnerbofh@gmail.com">sinnerbofh@gmail.com</a>&gt;:<br> <div \
class="im">&gt; Fabrice Facorat wrote:<br> <br>
<br>
&gt; But the ones they have: work great, are integrated with the rest of the<br>
&gt; ecosystem, are user-friendly and they are aesthetically pleasant.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; By focusing on 90% of specs and getting them to be 95% perfect, instead of<br>
&gt; having 100% of specs and getting them to be just 50% workable, regular<br>
&gt; people (95% of the population) like their products.<br>
<br>
</div>you&#39;re 100% right<br>
<div class="im"><br>
&gt; Apple&#39;s approach mimics the Unix philosophy (every small tool covers a \
task<br> &gt; extremely well, and integrates with the rest of the Unix system): \
every<br> &gt; single technical bullet point included does a task extremely well with \
the<br> &gt; rest of the tools and look&#39;n&#39;feel.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Mandriva tries that, with look&#39;n&#39;feel consistent on MCC, KDE and \
Gnome.<br> &gt; draketools work on TUI or GUI. They work well.<br>
<br>
</div>some tools does not work correctly however and are \
buggy<br><br></blockquote><div> </div><div>Better  is to fix them instead of rewrite \
all.<br></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]