[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       macports-users
Subject:    Re: On Snow Leopard, updating at-spi2-atk to @2.26.0_0+universal failed unless at-spi2-core updated 
From:       Joshua Root <jmr () macports ! org>
Date:       2017-09-12 22:50:39
Message-ID: fd5fdfd9-2db2-1abf-58a5-1d45b14446e9 () macports ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 13:58, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> 
> > Hardware Version: Mac mini (Mid 2007)
> > Model Identifier: Macmini2,1
> > Mac OS X 10.6.8 10K549 (Snow Leopard)
> > Xcode 3.2.6 DevToolsSupport-1806.0
> > MacPorts Version: 2.4.1
> > 
> > The error in the log file seems to say as much:
> > 
> > > info:configure checking for atk >= 2.25.2... no
> > > info:configure configure: error: Package requirements (atk >= 2.25.2) were not \
> > > met:
> > > info:configure Requested 'atk >= 2.25.2' but version of Atk is 2.24.0
> > > info:configure Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if \
> > > you
> > > info:configure installed software in a non-standard prefix.
> > > info:configure Alternatively, you may set the environment variables ATK_CFLAGS
> > > info:configure and ATK_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
> > > info:configure See the pkg-config man page for more details.
> > 
> > yet that was not done in the right order automatically.  Why not?  Is it new that \
> > at-spi2-stk configure checks the version of the prerequisite atk component(s)? 
> > I didn't use the -n option; the exact command I used was
> > port upgrade outdated and not ( avahi or cppunit or libiodbc or nmap or qca or \
> > cdrtools or smake )
> 
> Sounds like at-spi2-atk 2.26.0 requires atk 2.26.0. MacPorts should have \
> automatically upgraded atk to 2.26.0 before attempting to build at-spi2-atk. If it \
> didn't, you can try updating atk first.

As for the why, it's impossible to know from the information we have. 
The full log might give more insight; it should show each dependency 
being upgraded, with installed versions being compared against the 
current ones.

- Josh


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]