[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       macports-users
Subject:    =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_PostGIS_2=2E0=2E1_=DF_port?=
From:       Puneet Kishor <punk.kish () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-04-27 16:53:02
Message-ID: 5FC6131D-74C8-45A6-83DF-AE54FE2D9476 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Vincent,

Not an answer to your question, but a comment -- you are my hero. Well, you will be \
my hero once all of the below is done :-)



On Apr 27, 2012, at 11:41 AM, vincent habchi wrote:

> Chers amis, liebe Freude, cari amici, dear friends,
> 
> I am about to commit the PostGIS 2.0 port. It is going to be v.2.0.1-svn because \
> 2.0.0 has a bug that prevents successful compilation with clang. I reported it, and \
> it has been corrected in svn. This can be upgraded to 2.0.1 when it is released. 
> Question: ideally PostGIS should be indexed under both databases and gis. Is it \
> permissible to change in the 2.0 Portfile ? 
> Thanks
> Vincent



--
Puneet Kishor

_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]