[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       macports-dev
Subject:    Re: GSoC 2018 Project: Improve startupitem code
From:       Rainer_Müller <raimue () macports ! org>
Date:       2018-02-15 23:00:24
Message-ID: a5bed391-d552-8014-c42f-d46f5dcd2acb () macports ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2018-02-15 20:22, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2018-2-16 06:02 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> > > On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:47 AM, Joshua Root <jmr@macports.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 2018-2-16 05:04 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> > > > How to handle two launchd plists with "port load" command? Separate ports?
> > > 
> > > This is <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44295>.
> > 
> > Is this one of the issues you are closing?
> 
> I have an approach in mind.
> 
> > > > The common locations where launchd plists need to be loaded from:
> > > > ~/Library/LaunchAgents
> > > 
> > > Installing into ~ is problematic in general. I don't think it's really
> > > needed; per-user stuff can live in /Library/LaunchAgents.
> > 
> > Of course, thanks for the point.
> > 
> > So we might have "startupitem.directory /Library/LaunchDaemons", the default, but \
> > can be set to "startupitem.directory /Library/LaunchAgents"?

I think we should stick to our terminology of path vs. directory. A path
is an absolute location in the filesystem, a directory is relative to
some path. For example, ${worksrcpath} is the absolute path where
configure/build/etc. are executed in, while ${worksrcdir} are just the
last components relative to ${workpath}.

Rainer


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic