[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       macports-dev
Subject:    Re: [MacPorts] Migration modified
From:       <raimue () macports ! org>
Date:       2013-10-31 15:33:44
Message-ID: 52727858.7000909 () macports ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2013-10-31 16:06, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> The example breaks down when you have a package that cannot be
> installed on the new OS, such as llvm-3.0 on mavericks. You would
> have to uninstall all the =93bad=94 packages prior to running upgrade,
> and then do an upgrade =97enforce-variants to ensure it doesn=92t get
> included again.

Right... If we had the supported platforms in a declarative syntax, we
could include them in the 'obsolete' ports and just advise to uninstall
them. That would require #15712 [1].

Rainer

[1] https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15712
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]