[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lyx-users
Subject:    Re: numeric bibliography reference, biblatex, ieee
From:       Neal Becker <ndbecker2 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2023-11-22 15:31:28
Message-ID: CAG3t+pFhdUhTUDQmSjJZ6qKzE0vAe0AaQQHSP2XoP5cxxmRMKA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Thanks.  1st I found that if I choose biblatex natbib mode then numeric
does work.  As you mentioned I also found I needed biblatex-ieee package
and select ieee option for bibliography.

Now it works, but as I found previously, the bibliography thus formatted
doesn't look like the ieee formatting produced by the old bibtex mode.  The
older one produces entries that are more visually compact.  Not sure if
using different font and/or size.

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 3:52 PM Axel Dessecker <adessec@gwdg.de> wrote:

> Am Montag, 20. November 2023, 17:41:03 CET schrieb Neal Becker:
> > I just started a new paper in ieee style and selected biblatex for
> > bibliography.  I know I will probably have to change that because last
> time
> > I used biblatex with ieee the resulting bibliography was too large -
> using
> > bibtex produced better results, but that's not my question.
> >
> > I need to get numeric references in the text (e.g., [1]), but that
> doesn't
> > seem to be a choice.  Even though in document/settings/bibliography I've
> > selected numeric, that's not an option for "citation style" when I click
> on
> > the citation.  I've attached 2 pics to illustrate.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> Neal,
>
> Have you thought about installing the biblatex-ieee package? This is also
> part
> of texlive.
>
> Axel
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
*Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">Thanks.   1st I found that if I choose biblatex natbib mode then \
numeric does work.   As you mentioned I also found I needed biblatex-ieee package and \
select ieee option for bibliography.<div><br></div><div>Now it works, but as I found \
previously, the bibliography thus formatted doesn&#39;t look like the ieee formatting \
produced by the old bibtex mode.   The older one produces entries that are more \
visually compact.   Not sure if using different font and/or size.</div></div><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at \
3:52 PM Axel Dessecker &lt;<a href="mailto:adessec@gwdg.de">adessec@gwdg.de</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Am Montag, 20. \
November 2023, 17:41:03 CET schrieb Neal Becker:<br> &gt; I just started a new paper \
in ieee style and selected biblatex for<br> &gt; bibliography.   I know I will \
probably have to change that because last time<br> &gt; I used biblatex with ieee the \
resulting bibliography was too large - using<br> &gt; bibtex produced better results, \
but that&#39;s not my question.<br> &gt; <br>
&gt; I need to get numeric references in the text (e.g., [1]), but that \
doesn&#39;t<br> &gt; seem to be a choice.   Even though in \
document/settings/bibliography I&#39;ve<br> &gt; selected numeric, that&#39;s not an \
option for &quot;citation style&quot; when I click on<br> &gt; the citation.   \
I&#39;ve attached 2 pics to illustrate.<br> &gt; <br>
&gt; Any ideas?<br>
<br>
Neal,<br>
<br>
Have you thought about installing the biblatex-ieee package? This is also part <br>
of texlive.<br>
<br>
Axel<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div><span \
class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" \
class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><i>Those who don&#39;t understand recursion \
are doomed to repeat it</i></div></div>



-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]