[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lyx-users
Subject:    Re: Fwd: Re: subdocuments
From:       Wolfgang Engelmann <engelmann () uni-tuebingen ! de>
Date:       2009-04-30 7:26:39
Message-ID: 200904300926.39324.engelmann () uni-tuebingen ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Wednesday 29 April 2009 21:40:41 schrieb Guenter Milde:
> On 2009-04-29, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >> > I am still struggling with a book document. To make it easier to find
> >> > errors I tried to use 21 subdocuments (1 for the title and intro, 20
> >> > for the 20 chapters)
> >
> > This is strange:
> > I found, that one of the chapters (in a subdocument) contains an error
> > (pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd).
> >
> > Now if I run this chapter separately (that is not using the master
> > document db0) it works.
>
> If run separately, the doc will use its own Document>Settings, if the
> master is compiled, the childrens Document>Settings are ignored.
> Maybe looking for the difference will reveal the source of the error.
I have used the same Document>settings in all subdocuments,
but your proposal with an external file is much better and I will use it from 
now on. 
I guess it has to do with the aux file being used differently if I use the 
whole document (starting with the master docu) versus just a chapter sub-docu
>
> > I have started to divide the chapter in two subdocuments, and know
> > already the error is in the second one (and the second one alone runs
> > also without error), but do not understand the whole affair. My idea of
> > using this subdocument bussiness was to be able to find in the
> > subdocument possible errors faster, but that is apparantly not the
> > case.
continuing this I found out that the error was due to a reference. But it 
can't be the reference itself, since the same one is used at another place 
without giving troubles. There were two further references in front of it; 
moving it to the begin of the three citations in a row did not help. I put it 
in a note for the time being until I find a solution. I remember that this 
occurs apparently occassionaly in a koma-book-setting with two columns. 
>
> The whole thing gets more complicated, so your mileage may vary...

Fortunately I made a good mileage....
>
> > Since I have used separate chapters, there should be no influence
> > from or to the appending chapters (in koma book there are empty pages
> > between chapters). Could it be related to the input/ instead of
> > include- way of calling the subdirectories from the master??? Any idea?
>
> I don't think input vs. include will have an influence here. However,
> compiling stand-alone chapters vs. the maste might have.
>
> To make sure the custom LaTeX preamble is identic (and changes are
> reflected in every chapter), I use an external file (preamble.tex) and
> write in the Document>Settings:Preamble \input{preamble.tex} (or
> \input{../preamble.tex} if the chapter is in a subdirectory).
>
> >> > (2) Is input correct for the koma-book style or should I use include?
>
> Input is correct.
>
> Günter

I appreciated your help and the one of others very much. 

Wolfgang

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]