[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lyx-devel
Subject:    Re: Wrong display on lyx screen
From:       Kornel Benko <kornel () lyx ! org>
Date:       2018-11-16 16:09:37
Message-ID: 2631971.5otINPS4rA () amd64
[Download RAW message or body]


Am Freitag, 16. November 2018 15:48:01 CET schrieb Daniel <xracoonx@gmx.de>:
> On 16/11/2018 15:30, Daniel wrote:
> > On 16/11/2018 13:02, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Freitag, 16. November 2018 12:28:08 CET schrieb Daniel 
> >> <xracoonx@gmx.de>:
> >>>>> I am a fan of dotted underline for misspelled words as you might
> >>>>> remember. But I am not sure I would like emphasis to be colored that
> >>>>> way. It is normally not a mistake but intentional in theorems and 
> >>>>> such.
> >>>>> But maybe the search for character styles could highlight all 
> >>>>> instances
> >>>>> in the document?
> >>>>
> >>>> That is not possible ...
> >>>
> >>> Is this still due to otherwise bad performance?
> >>
> >> No, it is because we highlight only ONE found string.
> > 
> > So, does highlighting of all found strings seem like a reasonable 
> > enhancement?
> 
> Maybe I should have read your reply more charitable. I guess you meant 
> that highlighting only "ONE" found string is the only reasonable way. 
> So, let me explain a bit.
> 
> One could introduce a (different) secondary highlight color which 
> highlights all found instances in the document while the search 
> window/widget is open and the search string non-empty. Several 
> applications already support this including many browsers, pdf reader, 
> and word processors (not Libre Office though, I think, but MS Word).
> 
> Daniel
> 

I have no idea how to add it to existing search machinery.

	Kornel


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]