[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lyx-devel
Subject:    Re: Issues to discuss for 2.2.0rc1
From:       Scott Kostyshak <skostysh () lyx ! org>
Date:       2016-04-03 18:10:45
Message-ID: 20160403181045.GA14836 () cotopaxi
[Download RAW message or body]


On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 07:15:15PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Am 2. April 2016 18:48:12 MESZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skostysh@lyx.org>:
> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:11:33AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > > 
> > > I've found a solution for the strange crashes, strfwd.h must always
> > included first, if not the compiler makes assumption which are wrong.
> > > Now config.h for msvc2015 includes strfwd.h, not very nice but it
> > solves the issue.
> > 
> > Thank you for the fix.
> > 
> > > So I think we could risk a msvc2015/Qt 5.6.0 release.
> > 
> > I want to make sure I understand this statement. I interpret this to
> > mean that it might not be crazy of us to do a MSVC2015/Qt 5.6.0
> > release.
> > 
> > Or should I interpret it to mean that you now recommend a
> > MSVC2015/Qt 5.6.0 release over a MSVC2010/Qt 5.5.1 release?
> > 
> > Scott
> 
> I recomment now the msvc2015/Qt5.6.0 build. I think the risk is minimal, sure we \
> drop the beta feedback, but I have the impression there was not much feedback. And \
> 5.6 has features which users will miss, especially on Win 10.

OK good to know.

> And when we get horror feedback from the rc1 we could still go back.
> 
> Btw, why are the betas and rcs not announced on the webpage?

I should have put the beta announcements up. I will put the rc1
announcement when it's released.

Scott


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]