[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lyx-devel
Subject:    Re: Torvalds says he has no strong opinions on systemd
From:       John Tapsell <johnflux () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-09-17 14:50:15
Message-ID: CAHQ6N+oXPPsewF7Fb4nfz5wfMjV2B7h=wkDFiQd1Axh6EtsGdg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Oh, so that's why it's so difficult to use bibtex.  Hmm, I think then
you've just convinced me that systemd's approach is better :-)

On 17 September 2014 15:42, Richard Heck <rgheck@lyx.org> wrote:
> On 09/15/2014 12:39 PM, Jos=C3=A9 Matos wrote:
>>
>> While the above piece
>>
>> http://www.itwire.com/business-it-news/open-source/65402-torvalds-says-h=
e-has-no-strong-opinions-on-systemd
>>
>> I noticed that Linus refers to LyX in the context of the unix way:
>>
>> "And systemd is in no way the piece that breaks with old UNIX legacy.
>> Graphical applications seldom worked that way (there are certainly _echo=
es_
>> of it in things like "LyX", but I think it's the exception rather than t=
he
>> rule)..."
>>
>> Funny and interesting to read at the same time. :-)
>
>
> Nice to see that we are on his radar somehow. And of course he's right. T=
his
> value gets invoked here from time to time. No BibTeX editor as part of Ly=
X,
> e.g.
>
> Richard
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]