rgheck wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Richard Heck wrote:
>>  
>>>>> Your eLyXers is much better than tex4ht as far as I tested. I 
>>>>> therefore plan
>>>>> to include eLyXer to my Windows installer.
>>>>>             
>>>> That is an interesting possibility: not include the code in LyX and
>>>> just redistribute the executable file as is. I'm all for it.
>>>>       
>>
>>  
>>> it needs to handle the LyX format, pretty much without exception.     
>>
>> if this is required then better than writing some third party scirpt
>> we would need third kind of output routines directly inside lyx code -
>> as we have output for latex and docbook we would have proper html.
>> no need to check lyx format version then...
>>
>>   
> I've been thinking the same thing---though a general LaTeX to HTML 
> converter will handle anything LyX can produce via LaTeX. That's why I 
> still think that's the way to go.

If I had to implement something, I would do it in C++ within LyX 
personnally. Nothing but LyX knows its internal Buffer structure... I 
once thought that lyx2lyx knows about it but no, it doesn't... 
Conversion would be one-pass, fast and correct. And it could also be 
reused for rich text clipboard purpose.

Abdel.