[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lyx-devel
Subject:    Re: Outline more persistent
From:       Abdelrazak Younes <younes () lyx ! org>
Date:       2008-09-30 6:59:10
Message-ID: 48E1CE3E.6030907 () lyx ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 30/09/2008 08:47, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 30/09/2008 00:11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Richard Heck wrote:
>>>>> i tend for 3. solution but would like to hear your opinions.
>>>>>
>>>> I prefer 2, kind off. This can be done completely in the frontend 
>>>> using
>>>> simple string comparison techniques and session management. Each 
>>>> time a
>>>> toc reset is requested, save in the session the strings of all the 
>>>> nodes
>>>> that are not collapsed. When the model is reset, restore uncollapse 
>>>> all
>>>> nodes that present the same string. This method will not be 100% 
>>>> correct
>>>> but it will be just fine for most cases because only the current code
>>>> tipically changes, all others nodes keep the same strings.
>>>>
>>> I'd second that. And I'd think it wouldn't be that hard, actually.
>>
>> the obvious disadvantages of 2:
>> - it would slows the current editation even more (note that current 
>> trunk
>>    needs 12 (!) reset calls after 1 character change in section (some 
>> sample
>>    in userguide).
> There should be only one. And there was only one last time I touched 
> at this.

I just checked and there is only one reset of TocModels. I guess you are 
talking about the individual TocModel reset? Of course, there is as much 
reset as there are models.

Abdel.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]