[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lxc-users
Subject:    [lxc-users] How do I figure out what is missing when "lxc.aa_allow_incomplete=1"?
From:       Simos Xenitellis <simos.lists () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2017-04-28 10:21:27
Message-ID: CAPtVWc7S+U5hVWHfh4OExNA92Z+6GLw3v5iF0wdZ2i4Ea52gOQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi All,

I have been trying to run LXD on those new Scaleway ARM64 servers,
https://blog.online.net/2017/04/27/scaleway-disruptive-armv8-cloud-servers/

First, ZFS is not on the Ubuntu kernel and has to be compiled manually.
https://github.com/scaleway/kernel-tools/issues/346
It used to be easy before, but now it is a bit more involved. But can
be done in the end through the "make; make install" process.

But then, when I try to create the first container, I get
"lxc.aa_allow_incomplete=1", which means that something is missing
from the AppArmor configuration that LXD really needs.
I then run "lxc-checkconfig" (package: lxc1) and I the output that
shows that all are supported.
There are two things here,
1. either the config at
https://github.com/scaleway/kernel-tools/tree/master/aarch64/4.9.23-std
is not a genuine .config for the running Linux kernel (there is no
/proc/config.gz)
2. or, LXD needs more AppArmor features than those that were required in LXC1.

Simos
_______________________________________________
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]