[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lustre-discuss
Subject:    Re: [lustre-discuss] rpmbuild error with lustre-2.8.0-3.10.0_327.3.1.el7_lustre.x86_64.x86_64.src.rp
From:       Riccardo Veraldi <Riccardo.Veraldi () cnaf ! infn ! it>
Date:       2016-06-30 5:06:10
Message-ID: 606e1218-5d0d-3363-c071-0186b2be6407 () cnaf ! infn ! it
[Download RAW message or body]

The error indeed does exist. It hapened to me too.
For my own Lustre server needs I just fixed it commenting out  two lines 
in the .spec file since I am not running Lustre in High Avilability.



On 29/06/16 11:41, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 10:36 AM, Martin Hecht wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have just seen that you managed to mount with a different kernel, but
> > let me come back to this error when building your own rpms for a
> > specific kernel.
> > 
> > Independent if you use it or not, I believe on lustre servers you need
> > to have heartbeat installed nowadays. This is not installed by default
> > on a standard centos server, and it's a new requirement to build the
> > rpms since some 2.x release (it was optional before, and actually using
> > it is still optional). This requirement for building and installing the
> > server rpms is not mentioned in all tutorials and unfortunately the
> > absence of heartbeat is not properly detected by the configure system.
> I'm not sure that is the case.  At LLNL we run our Lustre builds through
> two different mock-based build farms.  Mock creates a build environment
> with only a minimal set of rpms installed, and then the only other
> packages that are included are those that are explicitly named by
> BuildRequires in the spec file.  I don't see anything that requires
> heartbeat, even in our local much-hacked spec file.  And we build just
> fine with the heartbeat scripts included.
> 
> But in any event a ticket would be good to open a ticket on this with
> fuller logs of the build included.  Something likely went wrong earlier
> in the build process for the Lustre.ha_v2 script not to have been
> installed (and therefore the .../etc/ha.d/resource.d directory to exist).
> 
> Opening a ticket on this and including the full log of the failed build
> would be good.
> 
> > It would be better to fail earlier, during configure, with a clear error
> > message, rather than the error during make which you have seen here (has
> > anybody filed a lustre bug about this yet?)
> > 
> > If you  aim to build lustre client rpms only, you can use the rpmbuild
> > option --without servers to work around this problem, but If I didn't
> > miss anything in the discussion before you are trying to build the
> > server rpms with zfs, so --without servers is not suitable for you, but
> > mentioning it here might be helpful for others who run into the same
> > trouble.
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > On 06/28/2016 04:55 PM, Yu Chen wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Trying to follow Christopher's advice to rebuild the lustre from src.rpm.
> > > However, got into this error:
> > > 
> > > ...........
> > > 
> > > make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
> > > 
> > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/lustre-2.8.0/lustre'
> > > 
> > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/lustre-2.8.0/lustre'
> > > 
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/lustre-2.8.0/lustre'
> > > 
> > > + :
> > > 
> > > + ln -s Lustre.ha_v2
> > > /home/build/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-2.8.0-3.10.0_327.3.1.el7_lustre.x86_64.x86_64/etc/ha.d/resource.d/Lustre
> > >  
> > > ln: failed to create symbolic link
> > > '/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-2.8.0-3.10.0_327.3.1.el7_lustre.x86_64.x86_64/etc/ha.d/resource.d/Lustre':
> > >  No such file or directory
> > > 
> > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Rhg32s (%install)
> > > ..........
> > > 
> > > 
> > > There seems someone posted to the list before about this error too, and no
> > > answers, wondering if anybody has some solutions now?
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance!
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Chen
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > lustre-discuss mailing list
> > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]