[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lustre-discuss
Subject:    [Lustre-discuss] Sudden ost crashing appears to take > 100s
From:       green () clusterfs ! com (Oleg Drokin)
Date:       2007-08-20 8:39:47
Message-ID: 20070820144027.GJ16857 () linuxhacker ! ru
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello!

On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 02:18:43PM +0100, Fegan, Joe wrote:
> When the watchdog fires (prints the stack of a thread) does this mean
> that the thread has been hogging the cpu for 100 seconds? Or that the
> thread has been *sleeping* for 100 seconds? Or something else?

It can be both.
What it actually means is that between watchdog timer was primed and now process
did not reprimed the timer for 100 seconds, but was it eatign cpu or
sleeping or any combination of those states does not matter.

Bye,
    Oleg

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]