[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lustre-discuss
Subject:    [Lustre-discuss] GCC version(s)
From:       braam () clusterfs ! com (Peter J !  Braam)
Date:       2006-08-14 9:30:46
Message-ID: D837FAFA5A674E45BD96F56DBDF8963236B056 () mse1be1 ! mse1 ! mailstreet ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

It looks like it consumes more stack than the gcc3 family, and we have
seen crashes due to that.  We are not 100% sure about this, but this is
what we are guessing at the moment.

- Peter -

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: jrd@jrd.org [mailto:jrd@jrd.org] 
 > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 9:12 AM
 > To: Peter J. Braam
 > Cc: lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
 > Subject: [Lustre-discuss] GCC version(s)
 > 
 >     From: "Peter J. Braam" <braam@clusterfs.com>
 >     Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:53:02 -0400
 >     
 >     Hi
 >     
 >     The gcc4 problem will be tackled during the coming 
 > months.  We hope, of
 >     course, to increase our agility and keep up a little better.
 >     
 > That's good to hear.  
 > 
 > What exactly is the problem with gcc4?  It won't compile?  
 > Wierd errors at runtime?  Something else?
 > 
 > 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]