[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: lustre-devel
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 11/30] lustre: mdc: allow setting readdir RPC size parameter
From: James Simmons <jsimmons () infradead ! org>
Date: 2018-09-29 21:11:37
Message-ID: alpine.LFD.2.21.1809292206330.25547 () casper ! infradead ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 09:14, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 17 2018, James Simmons wrote:
> >
> > > From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_net.h \
> > > b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_net.h index 2dbd208..cf630db \
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_net.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_net.h
> > > @@ -104,15 +104,15 @@
> > > * currently supported maximum between peers at connect via ocd_brw_size.
> > > */
> > > #define PTLRPC_MAX_BRW_BITS (LNET_MTU_BITS + PTLRPC_BULK_OPS_BITS)
> > > -#define PTLRPC_MAX_BRW_SIZE (1 << PTLRPC_MAX_BRW_BITS)
> > > +#define PTLRPC_MAX_BRW_SIZE BIT(PTLRPC_MAX_BRW_BITS)
> > > #define PTLRPC_MAX_BRW_PAGES (PTLRPC_MAX_BRW_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> > >
> > > -#define ONE_MB_BRW_SIZE (1 << LNET_MTU_BITS)
> > > -#define MD_MAX_BRW_SIZE (1 << LNET_MTU_BITS)
> > > +#define ONE_MB_BRW_SIZE BIT(LNET_MTU_BITS)
> > > +#define MD_MAX_BRW_SIZE BIT(LNET_MTU_BITS)
> > > #define MD_MAX_BRW_PAGES (MD_MAX_BRW_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> > > #define DT_MAX_BRW_SIZE PTLRPC_MAX_BRW_SIZE
> > > #define DT_MAX_BRW_PAGES (DT_MAX_BRW_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> > > -#define OFD_MAX_BRW_SIZE (1 << LNET_MTU_BITS)
> > > +#define OFD_MAX_BRW_SIZE BIT(LNET_MTU_BITS)
> >
> > Argg!! No!! Names are important.
> > "SIZE" means the value is a size, a number. The bit-representation is
> > largely irrelevant, it is the number that is important.
> > BIT(x) returns a single bit - lots of zeros and just one '1' bit. This
> > is not a number, it is a bit pattern.
> >
> > So settings FOO_SIZE to BIT(bar) is wrong. It is a type error. It uses
> > a bit pattern when a number is expected. The C compiler won't notice, but I \
> > will.
> > When I apply this (which probably won't be until next week), I'll just
> > remove this section of the patch.
>
> Just to confirm, my original patch didn't have these BIT() macros in it,
> and I agree with your statements, so I'm fine with you removing them again.
That was my attempting to handle a checkpatch complaint with this patch. I
do see your point in this. Still I like to keep the checkpatch numbers
down to to remove a potential barrier to the acceptance into the fs tree.
We could replace (1 << LNET_MTU_BITS) with LNET_MTU which is the same
value. I will latter post a separate patch to fix those checkpatch issues
up.
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lcommon_cl.c \
> > > b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lcommon_cl.c index 6c9fe49..d3b0445 \
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lcommon_cl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lcommon_cl.c
> > > @@ -267,27 +267,22 @@ void cl_inode_fini(struct inode *inode)
> > > /**
> > > * build inode number from passed @fid
> > > */
> > > -__u64 cl_fid_build_ino(const struct lu_fid *fid, int api32)
> > > +u64 cl_fid_build_ino(const struct lu_fid *fid, int api32)
> > > {
> > > if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32 || api32)
> > > return fid_flatten32(fid);
> > > - else
> > > - return fid_flatten(fid);
> > > +
> > > + return fid_flatten(fid);
> >
> > I preferred that as it was - it makes the either/or nature more obvious.
>
> Kernel style generally recommends no "else" after a return, and checkpatch.pl will \
> complain in this case.
> Cheers, Andreas
> ---
> Andreas Dilger
> Principal Lustre Architect
> Whamcloud
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lustre-devel mailing list
lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic