[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lustre-devel
Subject:    [Lustre-devel] [Lwg] Splitting up Lustre and LNET RPMs
From:       andreas.dilger () intel ! com (Dilger, Andreas)
Date:       2014-11-22 16:43:09
Message-ID: F9FCB7F3-3BC8-4601-9200-213660591BA2 () intel ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I suspect that LWG is too small a list to ask such questions. I've added hpdd-discuss \
and lustre-devel to the CC list.

I'm not against it in principle, but I have no idea how much work this will be to \
implement.

Cheers, Andreas

On Nov 20, 2014, at 11:50, "Nathan Rutman" <nathan.rutman at \
seagate.com<mailto:nathan.rutman at seagate.com>> wrote:


What does the community think about splitting the LNET build out of Lustre as a \
separate set of (source and binary) RPMs? This would make it easier/faster to build, \
install, and upgrade Lustre in existing installations without changing things we \
don't need to. It would also make it easier to re-use LNET in other projects, and \
make it easier for unusual users to maintain a customized LNET. I have no idea how \
this might affect landing in mainstream kernel. Thoughts / opinions?


--
--
Nathan Rutman ? Principal Systems Architect
Seagate Technology ? +1 503 877-9507 ? PST

_______________________________________________
lwg mailing list
lwg at lists.opensfs.org<mailto:lwg at lists.opensfs.org>
http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/lwg-opensfs.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]