[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lucene-user
Subject:    RE: Info required on licensing of Lucene component
From:       "external-opensource-requests(mailer list)" <external-opensource-requests () cisco ! 
Date:       2023-04-06 14:38:24
Message-ID: BY5PR11MB4088D0C534F4A068FE63A09AC4919 () BY5PR11MB4088 ! namprd11 ! prod ! outlook ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (text/plain)]

Thank you, Michael. This will definitely help.


Thanks,
Open Source Request Team

From: Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com>
Sent: 06 April 2023 03:39 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; external-opensource-requests(mailer list) \
                <external-opensource-requests@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Info required on licensing of Lucene component

> In that case, can you'll update your source repo for Lucene to exclude references \
> to ‘junit' from Notices.txt file since it is something which is not part of \
> distribution for Lucene.

That sounds reasonable to me.  I'll open an issue in our GitHub repo, but IANAL and \
I'm not sure how to specifically proceed.

I opened https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12226 -- let's continue discussion \
there?

Thanks for raising this Open Source Request Team at Cisco!

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com


On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 7:58 PM Michael Sokolov \
<msokolov@gmail.com<mailto:msokolov@gmail.com>> wrote: Lucene is licensed under the \
Apache license, just as it says in the LICENSE file. junit is used for testing Lucene \
and is not redistributed with it. Using Lucene in your code does not mean you are
using junit, except in some extremely philosophical sense. EG Lucene
developers may have developed Lucene using Windows on their laptops -
that doesn't mean you need a WIndows license to use Lucene. IANAL, so
you should ask yours - I'm sure someone at Cisco can help you sort
this out?

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 10:13 AM external-opensource-requests(mailer
list) <external-opensource-requests@cisco.com.invalid<mailto:external-opensource-requests@cisco.com.invalid>> \
wrote:
> 
> Hello Team
> 
> I hope you are doing well!!
> 
> This is regarding Lucene component licensing.
> The maven repo link  \
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.lucene/lucene-queries/4.10.4 for \
> lucene-queries 4.10.4 shows Apache 2.0 license associated with the component. Also, \
> the archive (lucene-queries-4.10.4-sources.jar) uploaded has a LICENSE.txt file \
> which has Apache 2.0 license, but it also includes a NOTICE.txt file which shows \
> JUnit (junit-4.10) licensed under the Common Public License v. 1.0. But there is no \
> code associated with Junit included in the source archive \
> (lucene-queries-4.10.4-sources.jar) file. 
> In this case, since Common Public License 1.0 is more restrictive compared to \
> Apache 2.0, for our better understanding,  can you clarify to us on what is the \
> actual Open Source license associated with the Lucene component? 
> Mentioning just two of the lucene components in mail as example for your reference \
> "lucene-backward-codecs 9.3.0" \
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.lucene/lucene-backward-codecs/9.3.0 
> Looking forward to your reply.
> 
> 
> Thanks ,
> Open Source Request Team
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: \
java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org<mailto:java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
 For additional commands, e-mail: \
java-user-help@lucene.apache.org<mailto:java-user-help@lucene.apache.org>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]