[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lucene-user
Subject:    Re: Using Lucene 8.5.1 vs 8.5.2
From:       Baris Kazar <baris.kazar () oracle ! com>
Date:       2022-07-26 22:32:20
Message-ID: BYAPR10MB242300D3FE14C8B5F675A80985949 () BYAPR10MB2423 ! namprd10 ! prod ! outlook ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


Great, 8.11 has gone further.
Thanks Mike
Best regards
________________________________
From: Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 5:18 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org <java-user@lucene.apache.org>
Cc: Baris Kazar <baris.kazar@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Using Lucene 8.5.1 vs 8.5.2

I would use 8.5.2 if possible when considering fuzzy queries. The automatio=
n can be very large, but if you=92re not caching the query then the extra f=
ootprint is not significant since it needs to be computed  at some point an=
yway to evaluate the query.

Really though, I would use 8.11 over either of those.

Mike Drob

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 1:03 PM Baris Kazar <baris.kazar@oracle.com<mailto:=
baris.kazar@oracle.com>> wrote:
Dear Folks,-
 May I please ask if using 8.5.1 is ok wrt 8.5.2?
The only change was the following where fuzzy query was fixed for a major b=
ug (?).
How much does this affect the fuzzy query performance? Has Dev Team done a =
study to compare Lucene-9350 Bug vs Lucene-9068 Bug?
https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_5_2/changes/Changes.html<https://urldefens=
e.com/v3/__https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_5_2/changes/Changes.html__;!!AC=
WV5N9M2RV99hQ!KtFc0vtdmzloavgQ0OWbsiryKhP4RuyVDtF3q6Nqvg9FnNjj2upvWEWr-FTAl=
T_bpV27jxBLCWUjDw$>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9350<https://urldefense.com/v3=
/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9350__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Kt=
Fc0vtdmzloavgQ0OWbsiryKhP4RuyVDtF3q6Nqvg9FnNjj2upvWEWr-FTAlT_bpV27jxAbGl5OU=
Q$>
Best regards




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]