[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: lucene-user
Subject: Re: Compound File Format overhead?
From: Michael McCandless <lucene () mikemccandless ! com>
Date: 2017-04-26 18:25:10
Message-ID: CAL8PwkZ_VnYT4pnKg-eF4yv0tAzmr56pPT5az3G+K5dC73gkWA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
There is no search-time overhead if you use MMapDirectory.
At index-time there is a small cost, since after flushing or merging a new
segment, we must read all bytes and write to the CFS, but that should be
low cost since typically the OS will have those bytes "hot".
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Otis Gospodneti=C4=87 <
otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does CFS/Compound file format have any known/measurable overhead? Or is =
it
> so insignificant that there is no value in trying to disable it?
>
> Thanks,
> Otis
> --
> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic