[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lucene-user
Subject:    Re: Copy and augment an indexed Document
From:       tsuraan <tsuraan () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-12-31 2:20:23
Message-ID: 84fb38e30912301820t38bd3223q10b624f0496f8fb7 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> It's an open question whether this is more or less work than
> re-parsing the document (I infer that you have the originals
> available). Before trying to reconstruct the document I'd
> ask how often you need to do this. The gremlins coming out
> of the woodwork from reconstruction would consume a lot
> of resources. For instance, could you guarantee term positions
> when you re-indexed the reconstructed document?
> What about stemmed words? How about synonyms?
> And are you willing to spend the time tracking down the
> bugs?

Well, that does sound like a ton of fun.  It's not terrible for me to
create new documents; the biggest issue is that they can be a bit on
the large side, and I thought that if I could use what's already
stored in the index rather than having to make lucene re-analyze it,
maybe things could be faster/easier.  It sounds like that isn't the
case :)

> As I said, I wouldn't go there until forced....

Yeah, that works.  I'll stick with feeding documents in the good old
fashioned way.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]