[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lucene-user
Subject:    Re: Are there any problems with the hits.length() in luc 1.4?
From:       "Aleksander M. Stensby" <aleksander.stensby () integrasco ! no>
Date:       2006-06-30 12:36:17
Message-ID: op.tbylarmfoftp72 () lettmelk
[Download RAW message or body]

Maybe you didn't close / open your writer/reader and that you where  
searching with a snapshot of the old index. And that after you had closed  
the writer and opened a new reader you got the correct result..?

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:22:40 +0200, Marcus Falck  
<marcus.falck@observer.se> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> I'm indexing around 200 million articles in lucene. I have for the
> moment added around 600000 articles.
>
>
> Using this technique:
>
> 5000 docs in RAMDir
>
> Flush RAMDir to FSDir to create segmentfile with 5000.
>
> Mergefactor 10.
>
>
> I'm searching using the multisearcher.
>
>
> When I had around 490 000 docs all new documents appeared to be in the
> index but the count for the word "kan" was just around 8000 hits.
>
> When the large merge occurred at 500.000 docs the "kan" count increased
> to 65000 hits.
>
>
> Any ideas`?
>
>
> /
>
> Regards
>
> Marcus
>
>



-- 
Aleksander M. Stensby
Software Developer
Integrasco A/S
aleksander.stensby@integrasco.no
Tlf.: +47 41 22 82 72

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]