[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lucene-dev
Subject:    Re: Any potential benefits to a SSDV#bulkLookupOrd(long ord) impl?
From:       Robert Muir <rcmuir () gmail ! com>
Date:       2021-12-17 15:20:20
Message-ID: CAOdYfZWR4hq0r=zUxj+VptHPZYL=6CM4LxEzTOmBrcZ_y1oFMw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:19 AM Michael Sokolov <msokolov@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > And you get two single-valued fields instead of one big multi-valued field... so \
> > I'm not sure I am convinced that "dim mixing" is typically a good thing.
> 
> Mixing enables the user to model multiple (of their) fields within a
> single Lucene field. You may have a very lightweight and
> loosely-managed "schema" (think lots of data suppliers all wanting to
> add their field names, but with no access to update the index schema)
> that you want to model in a carefully managed set of (Lucene) index
> fields.
> 

I do get that you have a use-case for it. I just personally think it
is atypical.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]