[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lucene-dev
Subject:    RE: more generic lucene-morfologik integration
From:       "Uwe Schindler" <uwe () thetaphi ! de>
Date:       2013-12-03 12:23:40
Message-ID: 0bfb01cef022$7fe4abd0$7fae0370$ () thetaphi ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

Thank you for your input. To better proceed with these improvements, please open an \
issue on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE and attach your patches there.

Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michal Hlavac [mailto:hlavki@hlavki.eu]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 1:07 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: more generic lucene-morfologik integration
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have little proposal for morfologik lucene module. Current module is tightly
> coupled with polish DICTIONARY enumeration.
> But other people (like me) can build own dictionaries to FSA and use it with
> lucene.
> You can find proposal in attachment and also example usage in analyzer
> (SlovakLemmaAnalyzer).
> It uses dictionary property as String resource from classpath, not
> enumeration.
> One change is, that dictionary variable must be set in MofologikFilterFactory
> (no default value).
> 
> thanks, m.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic