[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lucene-dev
Subject:    [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3581) IndexReader#isCurrent() should return true on a NRT reader if no de
From:       "Mark Miller (JIRA)" <jira () apache ! org>
Date:       2012-12-31 19:14:14
Message-ID: JIRA.12531947.1321628433962.66429.1356981254354 () arcas
[Download RAW message or body]


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin \
.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13541466#comment-13541466 ] 

Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3581:
-------------------------------------

Fixing this for 4.1 or should we push it?
                
> IndexReader#isCurrent() should return true on a NRT reader if no deletes are \
>                 applied and only deletes are present in IW
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> Key: LUCENE-3581
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3581
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.5, 4.0-ALPHA
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Fix For: 4.1
> 
> 
> I keep forgetting about this, I better open an issue. If you have a NRT reader \
> without deletes applied it should infact return true on IR#isCurrent() if the IW \
> only has deletes in its buffer ie. no documents where updated / added since the NRT \
> reader was opened. Currently if there is a delete coming in we force a reopen which \
> does nothing since deletes are not applied anyway.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]