From lucene-dev Tue Apr 26 19:51:03 2005 From: Daniel Naber Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:51:03 +0000 To: lucene-dev Subject: Re: svn commit: r164695 - in /lucene/java/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Hit.j Message-Id: <200504262151.03268 () danielnaber ! de> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=lucene-dev&m=111454508405362 On Tuesday 26 April 2005 21:09, Erik Hatcher wrote: > I don't know.... would it?  I have no preference, though it seems ok to > me to simply return null since this is the toString method.  For a > Document, the toString is only useful for debugging anyway. Yes, and during debugging it would be especially confusing to just hide the exception. Sure, people will see that there's a problem with a "null" document, but then why not show the exception directly? Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org