[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lua-l
Subject:    Re: Table enumeration order with integer indices
From:       Yan Li <yl.mechanize () gmail ! com>
Date:       2023-08-20 4:14:53
Message-ID: CACYGEmRcOes_nq0NZ4Z0QppqobJTR84atuXcnQ+qJwjT7KsmZA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Got it

Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9=B48=E6=
=9C=8817=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E5=9B=9B 20:45=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A

>
> No. As Fransisco already pointed out, that would limit our
> implementation options to little gain. For instance, in the past all
> that was true for string indices too, until it wasn't.
>
> -- Roberto
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div>Got it<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" \
class="gmail_attr">Roberto Ierusalimschy &lt;<a \
href="mailto:roberto@inf.puc-rio.br">roberto@inf.puc-rio.br</a>&gt; \
于2023年8月17日周四 20:45写道：<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid \
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <br>
No. As Fransisco already pointed out, that would limit our<br>
implementation options to little gain. For instance, in the past all<br>
that was true for string indices too, until it wasn&#39;t.<br>
<br>
-- Roberto<br>
</blockquote></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]