[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ltp-list
Subject: Re: [LTP] inotify02 is failing
From: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado () linux ! vnet ! ibm ! com>
Date: 2008-05-23 19:17:41
Message-ID: 48371855.9040801 () linux ! vnet ! ibm ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi Pradeep,
Pradeep K Surisetty wrote:
> > Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > Hi Pradeep,
> > >
> > > Please provide more hardware details (architecture, kernel version,
> > > glibc version, distro, cpu types, etc)(avoid providing hostname info,
> > > which might be internal to your use) to Mike for this. Probably, he can
> > > then help out in finding the root cause of the problem.
> > >
> > > Regards--
> > > Subrata
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 05:51 -0400, psuriset@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> > > > Hi Vapier,
> > > >
> > > > LTP test case inotify throws "get unnecessary event " and
> > > > fails because test count number is incrementing to more than total
> > > > number of test cases(TST_TOTAL). it is leaving below message.
> > > >
> > > > inotify02 10 FAIL : get unnecessary event: wd=1 mask=800 cookie=0
> > > > len=0name=""
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Could you check why is it happening?
> > > >
> > There was a bug in inotify, but has been fixed about 3 month ago in
> > the kernel,
> > and the relative ltp testcase was wrong, but also fixed. So when you run
> the
> > latest ltp in an older kernel, you'll get this failure.
> >
> > http://marc.info/?t=120651174200002&r=1&w=2
> > http://marc.info/?t=120660820500004&r=1&w=2
>
>
> Can you please provide me , on which kernel version this i notify bug has
> been fixed.
Some weeks ago, I worked on this same issue and discovered it was fixed recently, on \
kernel version 2.6.25-rc1. Here's the commit:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git-commits-head/2008/2/6/748474
>
> By the way, i coundnt find any bug related to our inotify test failure in
> IBM, redhat and SUSE bugzilla.
>
> i am running LTP test case on RHEL 5.2 RC2 GA (2.6.18-92.el5) and SLES 10
> SP2 GMC (2.6.16.60-0.21-smp).
>
>
> Regards
> pradeep
>
> > > > if (test_num >= TST_TOTAL){
> > > > tst_resm(TFAIL, "get unnecessary event: "
> > > > "wd=%d mask=%x cookie=%u len=%u"
> > > > "name=\"%s\"",event->wd, event->mask,
> > > > event->cookie, event->len,
> > > > event->name);
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > pradeep
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Regards,
--
Edjunior
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic