[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lse-tech
Subject:    Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and
From:       Paul Jackson <pj () sgi ! com>
Date:       2005-02-12 6:16:10
Message-ID: 20050211221610.46bbbd3d.pj () sgi ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I agree with 97% of what you write, Chandra.


> one more level of indirection(instead of task->cpuset->cpus_allowed
> it will be task->taskclass->res[CPUSET]->cpus_allowed).

No -- two more levels of indirection (task->cpus_allowed becomes
task->taskclass->res[CPUSET]->cpus_allowed).


> But, for your purposes or our discussions one would need only 3 modules
> of the above (core, rcfs and taskclass). 

Ok.  That was not obvious to me until now.  If there is a section in
your documentation that explains this, and addresses the needs and
motivations of someone trying to reuse portions of CKRM in such a
manner, I missed it.  Whatever ...

In any case, on the issue that matters to me right now, we agree:

> It won't be a happy, productive marriage.

Good.  Thanks.  Good luck to you.

> PS to everyone else: Wow, you have lot of patience :)

For sure.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Lse-tech mailing list
Lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]