'[logback-user] Logback v1.0?'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       logback-user
Subject:    [logback-user] Logback v1.0?
From:       "Pascale, Peter H." <Peter.Pascale () Pearson ! com>
Date:       2007-10-24 16:46:49
Message-ID: 6E84FB9FA1B330419ED4091A7766E34F09FDE3EB () BGTMNSRVE3MX01 ! NCSP ! PEROOT ! COM
[Download RAW message or body]

--===============0877204953==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8165D.78C5516E"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

We're interested in logback as a replacement to log4j. One of the
questions I get is what's the span in time and features between logback
today (v0.9.8) and a v1.0 release. Yes, yes - that magical 1.0 carries a
lot of weight with folks...

In trolling the archives and documentation - I did see reference to the
fact that the team believes in the value of sound documentation, and the
team isn't comfortable with a v1.0 release without good documentation.
Seems you are on track to rectify that, and I think the manual is great.
Bug fixes - I'm having a hard time determining the remaining significant
open defects. Would you characterize the 0.9.8 - 1 span as having a lot
of fixes? Few but important fixes? And what about features.

And I hate to dredge up this topic - but will we ever see a config file
watch such as log4j, and that was requested recently. Not a deal breaker
for us - given the arguments for JMX config reload.

And the magical question - rough timing of v1.0? Before 2008?

Thanks!

Peter Pascale

Pearson VUE

**************************************************************************** 
This email may contain material confidential to
Pearson.  If you were not an intended recipient, 
please notify the sender and delete all copies. 
We may monitor email to and from our network. 
****************************************************************************

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" \
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" \
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:Arial;
	color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>

<div class=Section1>

We&#8217;re interested in logback as a replacement to log4j.
One of the questions I get is what&#8217;s the span in time and features
between logback today (v0.9.8) and a v1.0 release. Yes, yes &#8211; that magical
1.0 carries a lot of weight with folks&#8230;<o:p></o:p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

In trolling the archives and documentation &#8211; I did see
reference to the fact that the team believes in the value of sound
documentation, and the team isn&#8217;t comfortable with a v1.0 release without
good documentation. Seems you are on track to rectify that, and I think the
manual is great. Bug fixes &#8211; I&#8217;m having a hard time determining the
remaining significant open defects. Would you characterize the 0.9.8 &#8211; 1 span
as having a lot of fixes? Few but important fixes? And what about \
features.<o:p></o:p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

And I hate to dredge up this topic &#8211; but will we ever
see a config file watch such as log4j, and that was requested recently. Not a
deal breaker for us &#8211; given the arguments for JMX config \
reload.<o:p></o:p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

And the magical question &#8211; rough timing of v1.0?
Before 2008?<o:p></o:p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Thanks!<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Peter Pascale<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Pearson VUE<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

</div>

**************************************************************************** \
 
This email may contain confidential material. If you were not 
an intended recipient, Please notify the sender and delete all copies. 
 We may monitor email to and from our network.
&nbsp;*************************************************************************** \
 
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
</body>

</html>

_______________________________________________
Logback-user mailing list
Logback-user@qos.ch
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user

--===============0877204953==--

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 