[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       log4net-user
Subject:    RE: Log4Net 1.1.1 Documentation?
From:       "Nicko Cadell" <nicko () neoworks ! com>
Date:       2006-04-23 21:56:58
Message-ID: DDEB64C8619AC64DBC074208B046611C7698BA () kronos ! neoworks ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

Dan,

The log4net 1.1.1 release has a number of known issues and is no longer
supported.
Please use log4net 1.2.10 from:
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/downloads.html

Regards,
Nicko  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lfn@danb64.com [mailto:lfn@danb64.com] 
> Sent: 19 April 2006 15:59
> To: Log4NET User
> Subject: Re: Log4Net 1.1.1 Documentation?
> 
> I realize that it is an old release, but I still am very 
> hesitant to consider using a beta release in a commercial 
> product.  If it is stable, then why hasn't there been a 
> general release?  It seems a little odd to me to go that long 
> without a general release, even if it is an open-source 
> product.  Version 1.1.1 seems to have everything that we 
> really need, although the ADO.NET appender would be nice.
> 
> Dan
> 
> From Ron Grabowski <rongrabowski@yahoo.com> on 18 Apr 2006:
> 
> > Log4net 1.1.1 was released in 2002. Its over 4 years old. Don't use 
> > that. A lot of people consider 1.2.0 beta 8 and anything after that
> > (1.2.9 beta, and the recently announced 1.2.10) to be stable. 
> > 
> > The documentation on the log4net website is for 1.2.9 beta.
> > 
> > I recommend coding against the download on this page:
> > 
> >  http://logging.apache.org/log4net/downloads.html
> > 
> > --- lfn@danb64.com wrote:
> > 
> > > Does anyone know where I can get my hands on a copy of the Log4Net
> > > 1.1 Manual?  I found the API documentation in the ZIP 
> file, but that 
> > > isn't very helpful for a newbie like me trying to learn 
> how to use 
> > > and configure Log4Net.  Also, I found the Log4Net 1.2 
> Manual online, 
> > > but I'm not sure what all the differences are between 
> 1.1.1 and 1.2.
> > > The reason I'm using 1.1.1 is that the product I'm 
> working on is a 
> > > commercial product, and so far as I know 1.1.1 is the most recent 
> > > non-Beta release available.  I don't feel comfortable 
> using a beta 
> > > version of anything in a commercial software product.
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > 
> > > Dan
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]