[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       log4j-user
Subject:    Re: concurrency issues with one log file for multiple
From:       Yair Ogen <yairogen () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-06-21 7:45:32
Message-ID: a44e15a30906210045l6fd9b675oa217f1da980c6b2b () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


AFAIK.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:31 AM, benedikt herudek <
benedikt.herudek@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am using one logger per session and use the name of the logger to place
> in
> the log file, no nested diagnostic context.
>
> threadsafe in this context means: no blocking of whole file for one
> session,
> no building of queues I assume ... ? ... :-)
>
> regards
>
> Benedikt
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Yair Ogen <yairogen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > log4j  is thread safe and should handle the concurrency efficiently.
> > I suggest you place tour OrderId in the log message using MDC.
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:12 PM, benedikt herudek <
> > benedikt.herudek@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > we are intending to use log4J in a call center: we have around 100
> > > simultaneous sessions working on one tool to create orders. W set up
> one
> > > logger per session (identified by basically the order id). All these
> > > loggers
> > > will write to one log file produced by log4J.
> > >
> > > Since we didnt use log4J before we want to be sure we are not creating
> > > concurrency issues and performance bottlenecks with having 100 session
> > > writing to one file. E.g. worst case scenario: 1st session loggs the
> file
> > > throughout its complete session and only releases it at the end, then
> in
> > > the
> > > meanwhile all other sessions queue up and wait. Rather, we suspect,
> log4J
> > > is
> > > automatically able to handle such a multiple sessions writing to one
> file
> > > situation and we dont have to bother with the details of that
> mechanism.
> > >
> > > Does anyone have experience, information, weblinks to documentation,
> tips
> > > or
> > > comments as to that problem ... ? ...:-)
> > >
> > > thx a lot !!!
> > >
> > > gruesse / regards / groetjes / adios
> > >
> > > Benedikt Herudek
> > >
> >
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]