[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       log
Subject:    Re: question about dan's code.
From:       Uwe Ohse <uwe () ohse ! de>
Date:       2000-07-31 21:26:37
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 04:19:10PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
 
> Wouldn't Duff's device be better? Or is this equivalent? See:

Duff's device is only usable for preknown lengths. You don't
have that in case of 0-terminated strings.

And even then it's ugly to look at.

Regards, Uwe

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]