[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       loadbalancing-l
Subject:    RE: Re[2]: [load balancing] Alteon Port Load Balancing
From:       Daniel Peterson <pdiddy_sa () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2002-05-24 22:59:39
[Download RAW message or body]

I was using layer3 load balancing in web OS
8.0.something and saw some buggy performance. 
Thinking back I believe the RIPs would sometimes be
returned to the client and end up kiling the
connections.

Just a word of caution,

Dan
--- Kenneth Thurman <kthurm1@nortelnetworks.com>
wrote:
> Just the IP service, the filter would not work,
> because the reply from the
> real servers would not be natted to the VIP address.
> But using service IP
> will do what you want.
> 
> Ken
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allan Liska [mailto:allan@allan.org] 
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 4:47 PM
> To: 'lb-l@vegan.net'
> Subject: Re[2]: [load balancing] Alteon Port Load
> Balancing
> 
> 
> Hello Kenneth,
> 
>   Thanks for the response, just to clarify: Do I
> have to create the
>   filter and the IP service, or is just creating the
> IP server enough?
> 
>   Thanks!!
> 
> 
> Friday, May 24, 2002, 3:08:07 PM, you wrote:
> 
> KT> Alan,
>  
> KT>   I want to correct this, you should create a
> service IP under a 
> KT> Virtual server, /cfg/slb/virt x/service IP
>  
> KT> That will do what you want I think.
>  
> KT> regards,
>  
> KT> Ken
> 
> KT> -----Original Message-----
> KT> From: Thurman, Kenneth [NTHR:9295:EXCH]
> KT> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:06 PM
> KT> To: 'lb-l@vegan.net'
> KT> Subject: RE: [load balancing] Alteon Port Load
> Balancing
> 
> 
> 
> KT> Alan, 
> 
> KT>    You should be able to do that, just enable
> layer 3 on the vip, then
> it
> KT> will do server processing on all replies from
> the reals.
> 
> KT> Ken 
> 
> KT> -----Original Message----- 
> KT> From: Allan Liska [mailto:allan@allan.org
> <mailto:allan@allan.org> ] 
> KT> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:53 PM 
> KT> To: lb-l@vegan.net 
> KT> Subject: [load balancing] Alteon Port Load
> Balancing 
> 
> 
> 
> KT> I'm curious as to whether or not this would
> work: 
> 
> KT> We have a customer who wants to load balance all
> ports between their
> reals  
> KT> (not sure why, I just configure 'em).  I know F5
> has this capability,
> but 
> KT> I don't see the same type of capability in the
> Alteon SLB config menu,
> so 
> KT> I was thinking I could do the following with
> filters: 
> 
> KT> 1. DIP = VIP with a netmask of 255.255.255.255 
> KT> 2. sport = any 
> KT> 3. rport = any 
> KT> 4. group = Customer's RSG 
> KT> 5. action = redirect. 
> 
> -- 
> allan
> allan@allan.org
> http://www.allan.org
> 
> ____________________
> The Load Balancing Mailing List
> Unsubscribe:   
> mailto:majordomo@vegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
> Archive:        http://vegan.net/lb/archive
> LBDigest:       http://lbdigest.com
> MRTG with SLB:  http://vegan.net/MRTG
> Hosted by:	http://www.tokkisystems.com
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
____________________
The Load Balancing Mailing List
Unsubscribe:    mailto:majordomo@vegan.net?body=unsubscribe%20lb-l
Archive:        http://vegan.net/lb/archive
LBDigest:       http://lbdigest.com
MRTG with SLB:  http://vegan.net/MRTG
Hosted by:	http://www.tokkisystems.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]