[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lm-sensors
Subject:    Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2/2] hwmon (dme1737): cleanups
From:       Juerg Haefliger <juergh () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-12-16 15:46:55
Message-ID: AANLkTik=YE_JRP8CNeA+8=BU12d6LQ9Fj6RvjaSVar1A () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Guenter,


> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:21:40AM -0500, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
>> Minor cleanups. Mostly removing assignments in if statements to get
>> rid of checkpatch errors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juerg Haefliger <juergh at gmail.com>
>
> Just wondering ... did you run this patch through checkpatch ?
> I did, and got 11 warnings for the unnecessary use of { }.
>
> Not sure if getting rid of checkpatch errors is worth it if you just
> replace the errors with warnings.

Yes I did run it through checkpatch. I'll trade warnings for errors
any time :-) No seriously, I personally think it's bad to not have {}
around single statements. It's not only dangerous but also
inconsistent with the rest of the code. I refuse to remove them from
any of the drivers that I own. Just my personal preference.

...Juerg


> Guenter
>

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic