[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       llvm-dev
Subject:    Re: [LLVMdev] ARM JIT support status?
From:       Rahul Garg <rahulgarg44 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-07-31 20:47:08
Message-ID: CAP_go09K6quN79wPN-KuL8ULODGMmpdLk-7bRppB-MGdudvwqQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks! Good to know its working in 3.1!

rahul


On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> 
> I believe that ARM support is working in the MCJIT engine (as of llvm 3.1).  If it \
> wasn't working in the legacy JIT engine 10 months ago then it probably still isn't. \
>                 
> -Andy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces@cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces@cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of \
>                 Rahul Garg
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:13 PM
> To: llvmdev@cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] ARM JIT support status?
> 
> The only reference that I found so far here:
> http://llvm.org/devmtg/2011-09-16/EuroLLVM2011-LLVMplusARM.pdf
> The presenter states that the ARM JIT support is broken.
> But this is about 10 months old.
> Is the ARM JIT support still broken? Am I not looking at the right places in the \
> documentation? Help will be appreciated.
> 
> thanks,
> Rahul
> 
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Rahul Garg <rahulgarg44@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > I am a little unclear about the ARM JIT support status. Is it working
> > as of LLVM 3.1? If not, is it on the roadmap for LLVM 3.2?
> > I am not currently interested in NEON support so if thats
> > unimplemented, thats fine.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > Rahul
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]